|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Recommended
Alan
Keyes’ Pro-life
Advocacy
Faith
and Freedom Foundation PO Box 1310 Herndon, VA 20172 info@faithandfreedomfoundation.com
|
|
Alan Keyes’ Pro-life
Advocacy An educational and inspirational archive
of selected
speeches, videos, transcripts & writings Timeless truths ·
May 1,
1995 - Alan Keyes’ Address to Newt Gingrich's GOPAC, Washington, D.C. (transcript
and video)
Excerpt: “In American history, you never
get away from the Declaration issues. They haunt you until you resolve
them, or until they resolve you. . . . The
abortion issue is a Declaration issue.
It's an issue that goes to
the very heart of our principles and how we apply them.” ·
September 10, 1995 – Alan Keyes’ Address
to the Christian Coalition, Washington, D.C. (transcript
and video)
Excerpt: “I'll tell you. I'll be honest. I think
that we have got to make the restoration of the moral and material
foundations of the marriage-based family the number one priority of
this nation's life. Nothing is more
important. Not the budget, not the deficit, not the taxes, not the
power of the federal government or the
state government. We will
rebuild our families, or we will perish ·
May 16, 2010, “The GOP’s uncivil
union-pro-life voters, pro-abortion money” (Loyal to Liberty essay)
Excerpt: “It has become painfully clear over the years that there are
undeniable ‘internal conflicts’ over abortion
and other moral issues in the heart of the GOP. Whether it’s
Republican First Ladies or influential
pro-‘abortion
rights’ donors and fundraisers, the Party has plowed the furrow of its
electoral ambitions with
a team that unequally yokes so-called ‘pro-choice’ donors
with a conservative base that is emphatically
pro-life.” ·
July 30, 2007, Crisis of the
Republic #9, "'Abortion Rights' and the moral threat to
freedom" (RenewAmerica
essay) Excerpt: “The moral principles of the Declaration of
Independence, and the moral character required to sustain them,
are
the bedrock foundations of American liberty. Politicians who disregard these
essentials in order to win
votes may pose as the champion of this or that individual right, but
as Hamilton observes in the Federalist
#1, they are likely to be among "those ... who have overturned
the liberties of republics ... commencing demagogues,
and ending tyrants." ·
April 27, 2007, "Gardeners of Evil" (RenewAmerica essay) Excerpt:
“We will finally get the
leaders America needs only when we resolve to become the citizens of
conscience
and principle that we ought to be. For
God and our posterity, now is the time.” ·
October 8, 2006—“Worldwide Sanctity of
Life” Blue Army of our Lady of Faith, EWTN (transcript
and video) Excerpt: “I think God wants us to remember, also, all of those innocent lives
that are claimed when we don't see it—
sometimes in places far away that don't touch us, in wars, in famines,
and other things sometimes induced
by human greed and lust and wickedness, but also the death of those
innocents that disappear without our
ken because we do not wish to acknowledge their lives, even as here,
in the United States, we now
proclaim the right to do to death the infant sleeping in the
womb.” ·
August 18, 2004—City Club of Chicago, Morality
and economics (transcript and video) Excerpt: “Now, some folks I know have
been a little critical of me, because since I stepped into the state, I have
had near my heart and on my lips the great moral
principles that are at the basis of this nation's founding,
and I have talked about the great moral crisis that we are in, and the
issue of moral principle, abortion,
that is at the heart of that crisis. And I have done so quite clearly
and quite consciously. I want to let
everybody know, because people are raising questions about this, and
some people are saying, ‘He's
just a one-issue candidate,’ and so forth and so on. I want to
make perfectly clear that the Alan Keyes
that is here today is the Alan Keyes who has been speaking out and
working, year after year, and over
the decades, with people of good heart, and I will continue to do so.” ·
August 24, 2001, Renewing American Principle Tour
kick-off (transcript) Excerpt: “We are in the midst of the crisis that results from so
many years when we've been turning our back on this
truth. And we've been listening to
those who offer the siren's song of self-worship to our people, convincing
us that because we've made these and those great truths and we have all
this wonderful wealth and we have
triumphed so often against our enemies, that that's all we need now,
we just need that power. And if we can
open up new avenues and vistas of success, then through that science
we shall be, as the serpent
promised in the Garden of Eden, as gods. You want to know the
interesting thing, though? That's no longer
a kind of abstract speculation, is it? No. We have folks who are standing right
now in the precincts of our
science and they're offering to us this very prize: ‘And ye
shall be as God.’ And one of the first things
they're trying to tell us is that we shall now be the creators of
life.” ·
June 23, 2001, “Declaring the right to
live” (WorldNetDaily
essay) Excerpt: “The movement against partial-birth abortion had, from the beginning,
two kinds of pro-life supporters. Both
sides agreed that an advantage of
choosing this aspect of the abortion issue was that here, at least, there
was some reasonable possibility of success. But one group was drawn to
the issue because of its powerful
presentation — magnification, if you will — of the
universal principles that are necessarily involved in any
abortion. The other group was drawn to it for the largely opposite
reason that it offered an opportunity to be
successfully "pro-life" while remaining a comfortable
distance from those pesky moral principles.” ·
October 28, 2000, speech at the Calvary Church in
Southern California
(transcript) Excerpt: “ We do not have a crisis because we are losing our
families; we are losing our families because we have
turned this nation's heart from its
allegiance to God Almighty. That is the source of all our ills.” ·
September 22, 2000, “America’s Unity
Call” (transcript and video) Excerpt: “Why shouldn't someone believe that we will ignore the
cries of the poor, that we will harden our hearts
against the needs of our
neighbors, that we will not care for the requirements of our aging parents
and
friends, since we are so willing callously to disregard the voiceless
cries of our helpless future in the womb?
It boils down to that in the end. Some people always say, "Why
does he always get back to that?" I'll tell
you why I always get back to abortion: because we can't have it both
ways. Either our rights come from
God, or they come from a human choice. Either our rights are here by
the will of God, or they're here by our
mother's choice. Either we must respect the integrity of God's choice
in every human being, in every human
life, because it is God's word and God's will before we have anything
to do with it, or not a single one of us
are safe in our claim to rights and freedoms.” ·
July 01, 2000, “Standing in the path of
evil” (WorldNetDaily
essay)
Excerpt: “It is still a great privilege to be an American citizen
and to be able to fight abortion in the political arena,
rather than in the streets and barricades. I count as a great
privilege every day that I am able to spend as a
free American, fully participating in our political life. In our frustration
and anger at the corruption of
American political culture, it is easy to dismiss the unique
opportunity this privilege still presents us. But
those of us who come somewhat recently from a heritage without this
privilege understand how precious
and important it is to be able to stand up, to speak out, to vote and
to run for office. My resolve to fight
the political battle against abortion to the end is inspired partly by
the fact that my ancestors were denied
the privileges of citizenship and enslaved for such a long period in
our nation's history by the very principle
that abortion represents: that it is possible for some human beings to
have a property right in the life of
others and to act in such a way that their power gives them the
"right" to disregard the basic dignity of
innocent human life.” ·
May 12, 2000, Rally in Idaho Falls, Idaho (transcript) Excerpt: “And, of course, the
beauty of it is that that also represents, doesn't it, the key to
understanding the basis
for
our moral character. If we acknowledge that our rights come from God, then it
follows that the same
rights
that we get from His authority must be used in ways that respect His
authority. And when folks
come to us and want to substitute human choice, and human will, and
human convenience for our respect
for that choice which God has made to implant in each and every human
being a kernel of His divine will,
which we must respect, whoever we may be
walking the road of American character and American discipline that
provides the basis for a system of
self-government that does not turn to licentious freedom and,
therefore, destroys itself. And that, I think,
is the key to this election. It's why I've always thought issues like
abortion are so important. It's not just
because we need to have respect for those innocent lives in the womb,
but it's also because we need
to have respect for the moral life of our country. And, if we embrace
the abortion doctrine, we are
abandoning the moral principles that are the basis for our claim to
liberty, and for that understanding
of freedom which is self-restrained, self-disciplined, self-governing,
because it acknowledges the
transcendent authority of Almighty God.” ·
April 29, 2000, Renew America rally in Alabama (transcript) Excerpt:
“Our rights don't come from God
if they are based upon our mother's choice. And once we have banished
God from the throne of that authority, then we
have no claim to liberty or dignity that cannot, in the end, be
trampled down and destroyed by the superior power of force, or wealth,
or ability. And one of the things this
nation is suppose to stand for is the equal dignity of all, regardless
of station, standing, intelligence, ability,
whatever it might be. That acknowledgment that in every human being,
in every human life, there is present
a kernel of God's word and divinity that must be respected by every
human will and power whatsoever.
But once we embrace the abortion lie, we throw away that truth that is
the foundation of our justice.” ·
March 8, 2000, Renew America rally at the McKay
Events Center, Orem, Utah
(transcript and video) Excerpt:
“No matter how you
cut it, the betrayal of our moral principles undermines our sense of moral
self-respect.
It
undercuts our moral confidence. It makes us susceptible to the arguments to
which we are talked out
of liberty and into an ever-expanding government power.
difficult, I think. For, we must return our allegiance to the
fundamental principle that makes us free.
We must apply that principle consistently to the great issues of our
times--starting with abortion. We must
go forward without shame and with courage and boldness to represent to
the American people, as we are
suppose to represent to the world, the great truth that our rights
come from God, and must be exercised
with respect for the authority of God.
way of moral self-respect and self-confidence. We will stand against
those arguments which suggest that,
if we control the decisions in the community, in the schools, in the
money, the world will deteriorate,
because we know that there is no need to fear the sovereignty of a
people who acknowledge the
sovereignty of God.” ·
March 2, 2000, Republican Presidential Debate, Los
Angeles (transcript and video) Excerpt:
“I think the most important way to stop the
coarsening of our culture is to return that culture to its basic
moral principle. I think the most incredible
coarsening of American life occurs when we sanction things
like abortion, which are basically on the argument that might makes
right, because the mother has
absolute power over the child, she can dispose of the child's life
according to her will. That notion that
you do what
you can get away with, that you go after anything that's successful, that you
make your
profits exploiting human lust, greed and whatever effects it might
have on the decency of a society you
go forward, that is what is destroying us.” ·
February 7, 2000, National Press Club speech and
Q&A (transcript and video) Excerpt: “The
pro-life principle is clear: that child's life in the womb is not a matter
for human choice, because
as a matter of American principle it is
understood that the right to life, along with our other unalienable
rights, is based not on human choice, but on the choice of our
Creator, God. A power beyond our power,
a will beyond our will.” ·
January 26, 2000, New Hampshire Republican
Presidential Debate
(transcript) Excerpt: “It is God's choice that that
child is in the womb. And for us to usurp that choice in contradiction of our
Declaration principles is just as wrong. Therefore,
how can you take the position that would subject such
a choice to a family conference or any other human choice? Isn't it
God's choice that protects the life of
that child in the womb?” ·
January 13, 2000—Proudly Pro-life Dinner
(transcript) Excerpt: “To secure the blessings of liberty by killing the posterity? It's a
very interesting thought. I guess you're liberating them from life. It doesn't work. And the cause in which we
gather here today, the cause that
reaches the lives of those individual children, is a cause that
therefore touches upon the future in a direct
way: in the voices that will not be heard, the work that will not be
done, the strong hearts that will not
stand up to be counted for justice in any way, the songs unsung, the
poems unwritten, the beauty of
God's mind that shall ever be locked away in secret from us because we
killed those who would have
been the messengers.
destroying that moral foundation without which it cannot survive. What
is at stake, therefore, in our
pro-life cause is the future of our nation, but also the future of
everything good that our nation has brought and
will bring to this world.” ·
December 10, 1999—National Guard Armory
Pro-life Rally (transcript and video) Excerpt: “Now,
I've gone through this kind of long preface because I don't think you can
understand the significance
of the issues that we confront today,
deriving from all of these various ways in which the regime of abortion
and the culture of death are working themselves out in our lives, we
can't understand any of these things,
in their true implications, if we don't continually remind ourselves
of what I've just said--and therefore of
the relationship between our moral principles and our national
identity, between what we believe to be just
and who we are as a people. Once we understand that connection, we
realize that whatever their specious
arguments that are used to justify the abandonment of those moral
principles, whatever it is they're
‘offering’ us in exchange, what we're giving up is far
more precious and important than anything they can
offer us.” ·
October 22, 1999, “Arguing abortion” (WND essay) Excerpt: “I understand that many people assume that my own
absolute rejection of the abortion doctrine implies an
absolute
condemnation of those who defend it, or even those who cannot find the will
or understanding to
stand with me to oppose it. And I agree that it would be a mistake to
conclude that all those who accept
abortion take equally immoral stances on every issue. But I
emphatically disagree that the solution is to
cooperate in the effort to put abortion on the back burner. Continuing
to raise the issue is actually a sign
of our deep respect and concern not only for the unborn, but for those
who right now reject the pro-life
position.” ·
June 18, 1999, "Renewing America's Moral
Self-Confidence"
(transcript) Excerpt: “I believe that this whole
business of abortion has poisoned the wellspring of America's conscience and
moral self-confidence, and led us to believe
that, yes, we are a depraved people incapable any longer
of turning liberty into a just and decent society.” ·
January 23, 1999, Conservative Political Action
Conference (transcript) Excerpt: “ I have, as you know, a fairly broad background. I have been involved
in foreign policy. I have been involved
in budget issues. I could stand up here and tell
you what you want to hear, probably a little bit better than most
other people, on any issue you want. Why is it that instead I have spent and
will spend every chance
I get, before you and every other audience in this country,
emphasizing one fact? We are in the midst of a
moral crisis; we must return to the fundamental moral principles that
this country was based on. We must
address the issues that involve our rejection and destruction of those
principles, starting with the issue of
abortion and the need to reverse Roe vs. Wade, and get ourselves back
on track in terms of our Declaration
principles.” ·
November 20, 1998, Our Conservative Principles: The
Path to Victory
(transcript) Excerpt:
“And that means that at the top
of our agenda we have to deal with those issues that corrupt our moral
heart, starting . . . not ending . . . starting,
and without embarrassment, addressing the issue of abortion
first and foremost. That issue represents the corrupt principle that
we can substitute human choice for
God's choice in the determination of human rights and human worth. That
is a vicious lie, and on that
vicious lie this republic will flounder if we do not tackle it, front
and center, now.” ·
June 12, 1998, Address to the Iowa Republican Party
Convention (transcript) Excerpt: “If God Almighty is the source of our rights, if His authority is what
gives us the right to lay claim to our
liberty, then it is quite clear that an issue
like abortion is not just a political hot potato. It's not just a
question for situational ethics. It's not a question you decide by
analyzing the mother's circumstances
and the child's state of development. It's a question that was decided
for us when this nation began.
Our rights come from the choice of God, not from our mother's choice.
We have no right to take the
lives of unborn children in the womb. We will not restore America's
conscience until we bring abortion
to an end in this country!” ·
March 1998 Speech to the New Jersey Right to Life
Conference (transcript) Excerpt:
“And now I watch as those who claimed, over the years, to be fighting
for the dignity and liberation and the
right treatment of women in the workplace and
elsewhere stand silently by while fresh example upon fresh
example heap up on the doorstep of the highest places of the land. And
they silently pretend that they
should look away because, "Well, this person has been so good for
women." I actually think that they
should have been given pause before now, but many of them being on the
wrong side of the abortion issue,
it never occurred to them that it is impossible to say that somebody
is good for women if they are not good
for the children they bear in their womb.” ·
November 20, 1997, Focus on the Family speech to the
physicians conference
(transcript and audio) Excerpt:
“Somebody's going to have to
explain to me, one of these days, why it is that we believe that it changes
something when we apply a label to it from Latin
or Greek. What is the Latin word for ‘infant?’ ‘Fetus.’
Why does an infant cease to be a human being because you call it a
‘fetus’? Why does an infant just
born, a newborn, cease to be a baby because you call it a
‘neonate?’ And why is the act of taking its
life no longer murder because you translate it into a dead
language? Dead language. Dead
baby. Is this
an equation? I don't think so.” ·
August 11, 1996, Declaration Principles Reborn (transcript) Excerpt: “And of course the issue that represents it most starkly, the abortion
issue, puts it right there in the most
intimate form of all. And they stand up and make
the argument in that form as well: "Well, this body, it
belongs to you, it's your choice, and you get to decide." And
then you have to go back and look at that
Declaration and ask yourself not how it applies to this government and
that law and that politics, but how
does it apply to us?” ·
January 27, 1996, Speech to the Louisiana Republican
Convention (transcript) Excerpt: “And He is clear. If that is where we stand, then some things are
pretty clear. When they come to us in the
abortion doctrine, and they say that they will
substitute the woman's choice for God's choice in determining
the humanity of an unborn child, I will look them in the eye, and I
will say, ‘You stand with that false god of
choice, I will stand with the God of justice!’" ·
November 4, 1995, Black Americans for Life Banquet
(transcript) Excerpt: “Now why do I go through all of
this? See, I go through it all because I think it's important that, when we
are
thinking about the most important issues we face,
we do so in the context of the most important principles
we represent. 'Cause I think in the end that's how you define the most
important issues, isn't it? The most
important threats, the most important dangers, the most important
problems are those which especially
undermine and threaten those principles which are most important to
your existence.
“And I believe that's why we're here tonight. I know that's what
keeps me going every day. And I also know
that it is the reason why the cause in which we have gathered must
ultimately prevail. For, this is the
simple truth of America's situation. We must reject the destructive
logic of abortion, or we will lose our
Republic. There is no
middle ground. This Republic rests on the premise that rights and freedom
come
from God. The notion of abortion rights rests on the premise that the
humanity and rights of the child
come from its mother's choice. And you can't have it both ways. It's
either human choice or God's
choice that is the foundation for our liberty.” ·
Video: Alan
Keyes on abortion and stem cell research ·
Video: America’s
Moral Challenge ·
September 17, 2007—Values Voter Ft. Lauderdale
presidential debate (transcript
and video) Excerpt: “Well, actually, it was a
policy of the Mexico City Population Conference. I was the deputy chairman
of
the delegation. I actually negotiated the language into the final resolution
at that conference.” ·
September 26, 2010—Wikipedia entry ·
March 29, 2005—“Jeb Bush is courting
dereliction of duty”
(WorldNetDaily essay)
Excerpt: “Since Florida's highest law grants him supreme executive
power, the governor's action would be lawful.
No one in the Florida judiciary can say otherwise, since the whole
basis for the doctrine of judicial review
(which they invoked when they refused to apply "Terri's law")
is that any law at variance with the constitution
is no law at all.
“Gov. Bush has said that he recognizes the injustice being done
to Terri Schiavo but is powerless to stop it.
He is obviously not powerless, and his view of injustice is fully
warranted.” ·
March 24, 2005—Alan Keyes: In defense of Terri Schiavo (WorldNetDaily essay) Excerpt:
“Despite action by the Congress to create an
opportunity for the federal courts to review and correct the
violation of Terri Schiavo's most basic rights, the latest effort to
prevent her judicially sanctioned murder
by starvation appears to be headed for failure. This is just the
latest and the most poignantly tragic
instance of judicial abuse tending to corrupt and destroy the moral
fabric of the nation. Despite the
outward appearance of deliberation, what we witness now as an ongoing
feature of the conduct of the
judiciary at every level amounts to a judicial riot, in which judges
and justices take it upon themselves to
disregard the prerogatives of the other branches in order to assert an
exclusive and tyrannical control of
public standards and conduct. Why is this happening?” ·
October 24, 2004—Alan Keyes speech Life Chain
rally, Christ Hospital in Illinois (transcript and video)
Excerpt: “When you have a choice between
someone who stands in defense of innocent life and someone who
seeks to extend the principle of abortion, even to the killing of
fully-born babies outside the womb, let
nobody in this state deny that that’s not just conservative
versus liberal, Republican versus Democrat,
that is GOOD versus EVIL and every conscience has to understand the
truth.”
“There’s a direct link
here between the practice of abortion that suppresses our allegiance to the
future in
the womb and the collapse right now, this minute, of the lives of so
many of our children in the world.
Abortion hardens America’s
heart. And as our heart
hardens, we turn our backs on the silent cry that
comes to us from the future as we extinguish the light that ought to
be born now to enlighten it. This
is
the real meaning of abortion, and it’s why I don’t feel
the least bit of compunction.”
·
August 8, 2004—U.S. Senate candidacy
announcement for Illinois
(transcript and video) Excerpt: “What
finally caught my eye, however, and what we have to spend some time thinking
through so that
we will understand, not just the
significance of the decision I have taken, but the significance of this
election overall, what we have to look at is what finally arrested my
attention and forced me to consider
whether I not only had the opportunity to oppose him [Barack Obama],
but the obligation.
to allow live birth abortions in the state of Illinois.
talking about a situation in which, in the course of an abortion
procedure, a child has been born alive—is
out of the womb, breathing and living on its own—and he cast a
vote against the idea that we should not
stand by and let that child die!”
·
Video: Keyes / Obama debates 2004 ·
Video: “Alan Keyes Condemns PBA Ban Ruling,”
Colorado ·
Audio: Dr. Keyes on KHOW and Alan Keyes with Kevin Swanson,
Colorado ·
November 4, 2006—Mt. Rushmore pro-life rally (transcript and video) Excerpt: “They have attacked our fundamental
institutions, and they have attacked our moral character directly
with this lie that we
have the right to take the life of our innocent children. Now, interestingly
enough,
this occurred, of course, in a Supreme Court decision. The last time I
looked, the Supreme Court has to
derive the basis for its decisions either from laws that have been
passed by the Congress—federal laws—
or from the Constitution. So, we must look at the law. We must look at
the Constitution to find out where
they've grounded themselves in this matter. There was, of course, no
law that allowed abortion. They
claimed that they found it somewhere in the Constitution--or rather,
that isn't what Blackmun claimed, no.
Blackmun actually claimed that he found nothing in the Constitution
that protected the life of that child in
the womb—that established that that child must be treated as
a person. He even went so far to declare
that if, in fact, you could, from the Constitution, show that the life
of that child in the womb must be
respected as the life of a person, then the claim of Roe would
fail--that's what he said--and there would
be no abortion in this land.
Constitution the way a sophomore would when he was preparing a little
paper for school.
Constitution in which the word "person" referred to a child
in the womb. Now, that's interesting. It's a frame
of government. Government usually involves adult people, and therefore
they didn't find any reference to
child in the womb in there. Isn't that interesting? Of course, they
didn't find a reference to eight-year-old
children, either, and seven-year-olds and five-year-olds. So, does
that mean we have the right to slay them
also? I sincerely doubt that. But even so, this was his way of
reasoning, and as a result of not finding any
reference to person, he emancipated himself from the Constitution,
started a review of all kinds of laws and
practices and philosophies, and religious opinions, because he
acknowledged that this decision about
abortion had always been made, in every society, throughout the
history of humankind in connection with
the faith and moral conscience of the people. Isn't that fascinating?
substitute for
their deliberations his own arbitrary conclusion that the "law," as
he put it, did not recognize
the personhood of the child in the womb.” ·
September 17, 2007—Values Voter Ft. Lauderdale
presidential debate (transcript
and video) Excerpt:
“I think the first and most important thing
that we would do is champion an amendment to the United
States Constitution that makes it crystal clear that
the right to life of all human beings, from conception
to natural death, must be respected. It's simple. It's clear. It must
be done.” Notre Dame
Obama protest – May 2009 ·
May 14, 2009, “The Notre Dame Scandal—A
Brief Report” (essay
at LoyaltoLiberty.com) Excerpt:
“They
react with forceful abuses of their authority because they cannot properly
defend their action in terms
of the laws of God and the teachings of the
Catholic Church. They therefore substitute force for
persuasion. In this too
they honor evil, by imitating its methods.” ·
Video Part I:
Dr. Alan Keyes Trespass Warning - Notre Dame ·
Video Part II:
Dr. Alan Keyes Trespass Warning - Notre Dame ·
Video: Dr. Keyes’ arrest—raw footage ·
Video:
May 9, 2009—Pass The Salt, Alan Keyes (exclusive) speaks of his
arrest at Notre Dame ·
Video: 2009 Hannity
interview on Fox News: Part
1, Part 2 Crisis
Pregnancy Center speeches ·
March 2006—Hope Crisis Pregnancy Center
(transcript and audio) Excerpt: “Second point is that, if you acknowledge the existence of
God, and then with contempt for His authority,
do what you please, then you are
saying that the authority of God doesn't matter. And if the authority of
God doesn't matter, why should I respect the rights that come from Him
if I have the power to do
otherwise.
if we turn our back on God. We can't sustain our claim to rights, if
we do not acknowledge the authority of
God when we approach the rights of others, beginning with the rights
of our very own offspring in the womb.” |
||||||||||
|
FaithandFreedomFoundation.com |
|
HOME | ABOUT | DONATE | ARTICLES | SPEECHES | LINKS | PRO-LIFE ADVOCACY Faith and Freedom Foundation is a federally-authorized 501(c)3
tax-exempt, non-profit foundation. Contributions to Faith and Freedom Foundation are tax deductible for
federal income tax purposes. |
||||||||||
